TAMPEI Organized Site Development Workshop for RVHOA Members

ILOILO CITY (April 17, 2011) –A Site Development workshop on open space planning was organized by the Technical Assistance Movement for People and Environment, Inc. (TAMPEI) for the members of Riverview Homeowners’ Association (RVHOA) in San Isidro Relocation Site in Jaro, Iloilo City. The main reasons for organizing the aforementioned workshop were as follows:

Old Subdivision Plan of RVHOA

Proposed Subdivision Plan for RVHOA

• Recommendations based on the monitoring and assessment of external evaluators suggest to review and revise the site development plan which shows that the area allocation for the open space intended for the construction of their amenities, was greatly prioritized rather than the area for the Category A housing participants which is the lowest income group among the three (3) income groups which was categorized by the federation 
• Findings on land survey and evaluation by the federation’s technical assistants show the irregularity of lot sizes and shape as well as unleveled terrain which needs land filling. Land filling of the area would be an additional burden and expense for the housing participants considering their very limited loan for construction materials which only amounts to seventy thousand pesos (P70, 000. 00).
• Formulation and drafting of the plan only involved the first batch of participants which became a limiting factor in developing a more comprehensive and inclusive plan which is generally favorable and beneficial.
• The awarding of house units and actual transfer of the first batch of housing participants in CLIFF San Isidro Relocation Site raised concerns on the matters pertaining to the utilization of the open space and identification of amenities to be put up in the area.  

The workshop was divided into four (4) different parts namely:

Ø  Rationalization- considering the reasons stated above, the main goal for organizing the workshop is to make the housing participants and HOA members realize the need to revise the original subdivision plan and thus actively involve themselves to act on the proposed change. Community architects and interns facilitated the discussion and presentation of the original plan vis-à-vis the proposed open space location highlighting the comparative advantages and disadvantages of the two.

Ø  Visualization- to prompt RVHOA members to initially think about their priority facilities to be put up in the open space area given the size and the location, familiarization of the boundaries of the proposed site as well as mapping out of existing adjacent structures  are very important. With the assistance of the community architects and interns, boundaries of the proposed open space location were marked out and participants walked around the defined boundaries to have a clearer picture of the area.

Ø  Identification and Prioritization of Space Use or Facilities- to have a more diverse and comprehensive decision in terms of prioritizing facilities and consideration of its space use, participants were grouped based on various interest groups namely: men, women and youth. Each interest group were tasked to list down the facilities they want, rank it according to their priority and present it with the big group to discuss the reasons for choosing such amenities. After which, the ideas of the three (3) interest groups about their priority amenities were consolidated.

Ø  Planning- after the consolidation of the various group’s priority amenities, identification of the area in which to put up the identified priority facilities was done as part of the planning for the finalization of the site development plan for RVHOA’s open space. Participants used scaled grids and cut outs in illustrating their desired amenities and posted it on an enlarged map to show where they want to place them.

The following are insights which were shared by the housing participants during the workshop:

v  “Revising the subdivision plan of the RVHOA as a whole is timely and appropriate especially now that our members started to transfer here in the relocation site and occupy their new houses. We are continuously growing in terms of our population in CLIFF San Isidro Site which I think should entail better planning of our open spaces and its usage”, says Joel Sicat, RHOA President during the expectation setting and impression sharing part of the workshop.

v  Basketball Court, botanical garden, community mini-market, Material Recovery Facility (MRF), chapel, community hall and playground are among the amenities or facilities which were mainly considered by the participants. These are the things which the participants deemed necessary and are reflective of men, women and youth’s priority. The basketball court according to them can serve as a multi-purpose area for the community’s various activities. The botanical garden and the mini-market were primarily suggested by the group of women participants who consider it essential to have a source of herbal medicine and accessible market. While the youth particularly those age ranges from three (3) to eight (8) years old expressed their suggestion of a playground to be included as one of the amenities in the open space through their drawings.

The aforementioned activity is part of the organizational development workshop being conducted and organized for Philippine Alliance’s community members and partners. Such undertaking shows that in decision making, despite the fact that the alliance adheres toward ensuring that the community is in charge of determining the solutions for their problems as well as in recognizing the things which are beneficial for them, final decisions are always made in consideration with the recommendations of the federation’s community architects and engineers who have the technical skills, formal training and substantial background on the subject matter. This is a concrete manifestation of the importance of technical support institution like TAMPEI particularly in the slum upgrading initiatives of an urban poor federation like HPFPI.

TAMPEI, ICUPN, HPFPI-PACSII FACILITATE COMMUNITY CONSULTATION IN HINACTACAN, LAPAZ

Iloilo City – March 04, 2011- The Technical Assistance Movement for People and Environment (TAMPEI) together with Homeless People’s Federation Philippines Inc. (HPFPI) and Philippine Action for Community-led Shelter Initiatives Inc. (PACSII) in collaboration with the Iloilo City Urban Poor Network facilitated a community consultation meeting in Barangay Hinactacan, Lapaz, Iloilo City. The meeting was organized by Benfred Tacuyan, President of the Iloilo City Urban Poor Federation, Inc. (ICUPFI) as a response to the barangay’s request for technical assistance to come up with an output which will be helpful for their initiative of securing land tenure.

 As a head start, Arch. Villa Mae Libutaque, TAMPEI President facilitated the leveling off of expectations. Lorie Bautista, one of the community members brought up her expectation and said, “We are here to listen to you since Benfred told us that you can help us solve our problems here in Hinactacan, we expect that you can provide us with tangible solutions which will be applicable to us”. Most of the participants affirmed to her response but Arch. Libutaque challenged them and said, “It should be the other way around, we are here to listen to you, tell us your problems and together, we will think about the ways on how to deal with it”.

According to local residents of Barangay Hinactacan, Lapaz, the land that they currently occupy was formerly a low-lying wetland which was and still being flooded regularly since it is located along Iloilo River and facing Iloilo-Guimaras Straight. Residents of Barangay Hinactacan are former or current workers in fish ponds surrounding the area who decided to put up some elevated huts as their temporary shelters for their convenience. In the course of time, these people who eventually developed the land by land filling, put up house structures and started to raise their family there.

Just a few years ago, a land owner from a neighboring lot made a proposal of building a memorial park on the lot area adjacent to Barangay Hinactacan.  This proposal has raised the local residents’ concern on their security of land tenure. Majority of them feared of being evicted considering that they do not have any legal documents which will support their claim of occupancy and right to the land. In order to clear up the issues, the said landowner called for a meeting and settled their issues by presenting the exact location of the lot where he intended to build the memorial park.  Confident that they will not be evicted from the land that they presently occupy because of what the landowner said, the community members started to disregard the issue. Years later, after the death of the aforementioned landowner, his wife started to claim the land as their property. She made a deal which required the residents of Hinactacan to pay for the rent of the land and even offered the property for sale.

The unexpected problem which arise due to the claim revived the threat of eviction which the community-felt years ago.

As a response, the community made initial research about the status of the land. Their initial findings showed ambiguous results which made it very difficult for the community to determine the real owner of the lot. The only thing that they hold on to is the likelihood that the land is a government property which they hope to be proclaimed by the President as a socialized housing site.

As suggested by Iloilo City Urban Poor Affairs Office (ICUPAO), proponents of the housing proclamation should submit to Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC) a letter request together with a list of actual occupants of the area duly certified by the ICUPAO, sketch map and boundary description of the area or property.


As a response, TAMPEI facilitated a community mapping together with five (5) community members who are very much familiar with the frontier and the geographical area of Barangay Hinactacan, Lapaz. With the assistance of Arch. Libutaque and Arch. Ebreo of TAMPEI, community members draw the house structure, alleys, and boundaries of the barangay and eventually measured its perimeter. Data or information gathered through spot mapping and measurement will then  be formalized by the aforementioned technical assistants. Moreover, Helen Villarin, a community leader from HPFP suggested the conduct of an enumeration. She gave an orientation on how to use the HPFPI community survey form as it would be useful in coming up with a comprehensive barangay profile.

Currently an estimated total of 120 house structures with a population of 737 people reside in the area. Although the assistance extended by TAMPEI, ICUPN and HPFP-PACSII seems an indecisive solution to the community’s problem, certainly it has shown signs of concern among the urban poor communities which will surely strengthen their cooperation.